Showing posts with label risk management through legal entity structure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label risk management through legal entity structure. Show all posts

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Reflections of “Man’s Best Friend” in Protecting Client Interests



Most avid dog owners will admit their canine companions are creatures of habit, comfortable in their routines, yet still guided by instincts of which we as humans are basically clueless. The moment you “think” you have figured out all this instinctive behavior can often have surprising consequences. Fortunately for me and my dog Eddi, a German short-haired pointer, we haven’t become candidates quite yet for America’s Funniest Home Video, but there’s still time.

Early one morning recently, I let Eddi out in the backyard to do her normal “business,” something that generally takes about 2 or 3 minutes. When she didn’t return on time as usual, I became a little anxious. As it turns out, she was gathering an opossum — undoubtedly a valued gift for her master. I must note that I have received this same gift several times over already. Her strong instincts to hunt and track game don’t end with unsuspecting opossums, however.

This past summer, Eddi resorted to chasing small black bears. After numerous encounters with chasing these wild animals up trees and through the lowland forests, I knew I had to address her uncontrollable behavior, mostly for her own protection. So, I invested in a shock collar to help reinforce my stop commands, which she had obeyed previously, in addition to developing some new commands to help guard against her sometimes out-of control behavior.

By now, you’re probably wondering where I am headed with this personal tale. It’s simple. Out of love and fondness for our four-legged companions, we often assign them human traits, mostly the ability to think and reason, but what about man? Do we not sometimes exhibit that same lack of control of our behavior that we witness in our pets? We don’t have full reign over our lives entirely; we depend on others, much like our pets depend on us. Attorney-client relationships should be built on the premise of trust and dependence to consult with each other and openly discuss issues before chasing that proverbial bear up a tree.

My clients that have the most control over their businesses and the fewest legal conflicts are the ones that come to me early on to discuss potential problems before they escalate into legal dilemmas. In promulgating contractual relationships, we can modify documentation where necessary to protect clients’ interests, making sure they fully understand all pertinent issues beforehand. Those who instinctively feel they can handle their own legal matters or sign contracts without first consulting an attorney are the ones who usually end up in litigious situations because they don’t understand the ramifications of their decision.

Of course, I must confess that perhaps some of my clients occasionally gaze upon me unknowingly like my dog Eddi, asking herself, “What is he doing?” After the recent encounters with bears, she took on a new challenge a couple of times — herding elk. She gets behind the herd and chases them towards me, which is probably instinctual, encircling game and bringing it back to the hunter, waiting for the hunter to kill it. Well, I am no hunter, so she probably thinks I am the most inept owner in the world because she’s doing all the work and I’m not finishing the task. As Eddi’s master, though, it is my responsibility to protect her and safeguard her behavior as much as possible, particularly with new experiences, such as chasing elk. I have that same obligation to my clients.

Just as I have to constantly retrain Eddi to keep her clear of harmful encounters with other animals, I try to continually steer my clients in the right direction. In fact, it is often my role to discuss clients’ new business proposals. We review contract language; we talk about potential risks and rewards; we examine ways to avoid risk; and we look at how to increase the opportunities for more business and further benefits. I believe that all successful businesses, like pets and our selves, should require the same consideration of their well-being.

Monday, November 7, 2011

Your Legal Entity Is the Life Jacket of Your Business

Living in the Seattle area, it’s probably not too surprising to discover that I have a boat. I love owning a boat, but one thing about living on the Sound that I’ve learned is that there’s a lot of prep that has to be done before the boat gets launched. The same thing is true about launching a business.

There’s more to consider when launching a new business than what the name should be, and a lot of the decisions you make about the business should be made before you start. One of the most critical decisions you’ll make about your business is what kind of legal entity to create. It can be very confusing. Many calls I receive for help are from people who are half-way through trying to set up their business using an online service like LegalZoom and they suddenly realize just how complicated the matter can be.

Everything from how you handle banking to how you are taxed will be affected by the type of entity you create, so choosing the right type for you and your business is crucial. In the coming months, we’ll explore the advantages and disadvantages of different types of legal business entities in more detail.

Business Types

There are several different options you have when forming your business. Which you choose depends entirely on the needs of you as a person, the needs of the business, and the number of people involved in the ownership of the company. There is inherent risk in operating a business, but choosing the right entity formation can help minimize your risk.

Sole Proprietorship. A sole proprietorship is the simplest and the least costly to create. However, it does not offer any protection for personal assets against risk. Basically, the individual is simply operating under his or her own name or using a business name for doing business by filing a DBA form with their county clerk. The individual owns and operates the firm, assumes all the debt and liability of the firm, and files taxes using his or her own social security number at the end of the year.

Partnerships. A partnership is similar to a sole proprietorship. It is easy to form, with minimal start up costs. The only difference is that two or more people come together to form the business and agree to work together as co-owners of the business, usually under a partnership agreement or contract.

Limited Liability Corporations. Limited liability corporations (LLC) have become the most popular form of business entity, combining the strength of a partnership with the protection of a corporation without assuming the corporate tax structure. The terms of an LLC as an entity are governed by state statute, so laws will vary from state to state.

C Corporation. A C corporation is so named because it is governed by subchapter C in the IRS code governing corporations. A C Corporation files taxes as an entity and must have shareholders who elect a board of directors to make business decisions. The risks associated with a C Corporation are minimal compared to the other forms of business, but the costs associated with start up can be quite high.

S Corporation. To overcome the singular disadvantage of a C Corporation, in which both the corporate entity and the individuals who share in its profits are taxed on the same income, an S Corporation can be organized. The organizational structure of an S corporation is similar to that of a C Corporation, but in an S Corporation, the members can elect to be taxed individually for the profits generated by the business rather than be required to pay corporate taxes. The S Corp—as well as the Limited Liability Entity—has the added benefit of providing the owners savings on Self Employment Tax.

The forgoing information should be considered informational only and not construed as legal advice. Before selecting a business entity, a person should consult an attorney in his or her jurisdiction.